- Veto blocks mandatory state-local cooperation with federal immigration efforts
- Bill would have enforced database sharing and immigration detainer compliance
- Opponents cite legal precedents like 2013 racial profiling case against Arpaio
- Conflict continues over state agency funding tied to legislative standoff
Democratic Governor Katie Hobbs has rejected a Republican-backed proposal requiring Arizona government agencies to actively assist federal immigration enforcement. The controversial legislation sought to mandate cooperation with detainers, federal database usage, and information sharing during bail hearings. This marks Hobbs' latest clash with GOP lawmakers over immigration policy, following her 2023 veto of a similar border-crossing criminalization measure.
Supporters argue the bill would streamline deportations by keeping undocumented immigrants in custody until federal authorities arrive. However, critics highlight the financial burden this would place on county jails. A 2024 analysis shows housing detainees costs Arizona counties approximately $150 daily per individual – expenses not reimbursed by federal programs.
The veto revives memories of Arizona's contentious immigration history, particularly Maricopa County's 2013 racial profiling judgment. Legal experts note the bill's similarity to policies that led to $200 million in court settlements during former Sheriff Joe Arpaio's tenure. Phoenix Police Chief Michael Sullivan warns such measures damage community trust: When immigrant neighborhoods fear interaction with officers, solving crimes becomes exponentially harder.
This legislative battle occurs amidst a broader stalemate over developmental disability services funding. Hobbs has vowed to veto all bills until Republicans approve budget adjustments for the state's Department of Economic Security. Political analysts suggest the immigration bill's timing aimed to pressure Democrats during election season, as similar measures historically boost conservative voter turnout.
Constitutional law professor Angela Wright notes: Arizona remains ground zero for testing states' immigration enforcement boundaries. While the 2010 SB1070 law permits resident lawsuits over non-cooperation, actual cases remain surprisingly rare – only 12 documented attempts in 14 years.
With the 2024 ballot measure already approved by voters, Arizona faces potential conflicts between state-mandated border policies and federal jurisdiction. Border county supervisors express concern about unfunded mandates, particularly in rural areas where detention costs could consume 15-20% of annual law enforcement budgets.
