Technology

How DeepSeek and ChatGPT Diverge on Sensitive Chinese Topics

How DeepSeek and ChatGPT Diverge on Sensitive Chinese Topics
Artificial Intelligence
China

In the increasingly competitive world of artificial intelligence, Chinese startup DeepSeek has launched its new AI chatbot, stirring conversations about AI development between China and the United States. DeepSeek’s app swiftly gained attention, becoming the top downloaded free app in Apple's iPhone store on a recent Tuesday afternoon, and it’s causing ripples in the tech industry.

This launch raises questions about whether DeepSeek can compete with American AI powerhouses like OpenAI's ChatGPT, especially given the technological and economic implications. While the impact of DeepSeek’s chatbot on the AI industry is still unfolding, one notable observation is how it handles sensitive topics, often reflecting Chinese internet norms.

China’s regulatory landscape poses unique challenges. In 2023, new regulations required tech companies to go through security reviews and obtain governmental approvals before launching AI products publicly. This context explains why DeepSeek’s responses to certain inquiries are cautious or limited, a behavior not uncommon in China’s tightly regulated digital sphere.

Comparing DeepSeek and ChatGPT on sensitive topics provides fascinating insights. For instance, the character Winnie the Pooh is a known symbol of satire against President Xi Jinping. On this, ChatGPT acknowledged the political undertones and mentioned the comparisons rooted in similarity debates. In contrast, DeepSeek’s chatbot avoided political satire, focusing instead on the non-controversial popularity of the character among children, followed by reiterating the Chinese government's commitment to a ‘wholesome cyberspace’ aligned with socialist values.

Another notable comparison arises when discussing historical events like the 1989 Tiananmen Square incident. This remains a sensitive issue in China, and when prompted, DeepSeek’s chatbot deflects, suggesting a change of topic. Meanwhile, ChatGPT offers detailed accounts of the event, its significance, casualties, and its legacy in modern history.

On international relations, DeepSeek's responses align with official Chinese narratives. It describes the U.S.-China relationship as crucial, emphasizing mutual respect and cooperation. In comparison, ChatGPT presents a more nuanced picture, acknowledging complexities like geopolitical tensions, economic interdependence, and areas of cooperation, such as global challenge resolutions.

The subject of Taiwan further illustrates their divergent approaches. DeepSeek maintains the stance that Taiwan is historically and integrally part of China, echoing official postures. ChatGPT, however, outlines various perspectives, noting China’s claim and Taiwan’s functioning as a de facto independent entity.

As these AI technologies advance, their varied responses to sensitive questions highlight the continuous negotiation between technological innovation and regulatory environments. The conversation underscores the dynamic between global technological influence and local regulatory nuances, as AI companies around the world navigate their respective landscapes.