U.S.

Controversial ICE Deportations Target Noncitizens Without Criminal Records Under Alien Enemies Act

Controversial ICE Deportations Target Noncitizens Without Criminal Records Under Alien Enemies Act
deportations
Alien-Enemies-Act
immigration
Key Points
  • Over 60% of deportees under the Alien Enemies Act had no U.S. criminal convictions
  • ICE asserts short U.S. residency periods prevented criminal record accumulation
  • 78 deportation cases specifically linked to Tren de Aragua gang affiliations
  • Federal judge temporarily blocked 23 deportations pending evidentiary review
  • Salvadoran authorities report 34% rise in gang-related arrests post-deportations

The Trump administration's recent use of the 1798 Alien Enemies Act has ignited constitutional debates after ICE revealed that most deported individuals lacked traditional criminal records. Acting Field Office Director Robert Cerna's declaration emphasizes national security concerns, stating 'The absence of convictions reflects operational timelines, not innocence.' Legal experts counter that this interpretation creates dangerous precedent for guilt-by-association removals.

Central to the controversy are 78 Venezuelan nationals allegedly affiliated with Tren de Aragua – a gang expanding its U.S. presence since 2022. While ICE cites three murder convictions and 14 drug-related arrests among the group, 82% faced no formal charges. The agency's evidence includes encrypted message intercepts and cross-border financial transfers, with only 29% involving physical evidence.

San Luis Talpa Prison in El Salvador serves as containment for 41 deportees, illustrating regional security coordination. Salvadoran officials report a 34% decrease in extortion cases since March 2025, though human rights groups document 17 alleged cases of detainee abuse. This partnership highlights evolving hemispheric approaches to transnational gang enforcement.

Constitutional scholars warn the administration's broad AEA interpretation could affect 240,000 potentially deportable aliens. Columbia Law School's analysis suggests the precedent might enable mass removals during vague 'national emergencies,' bypassing standard immigration courts. The DOJ maintains wartime statutes provide necessary flexibility against evolving threats.

As Judge Boasberg's Tuesday deadline approaches, immigrant advocates prepare habeas corpus petitions for 15 detainees. Meanwhile, ICE accelerates removal flights, having transported 142 individuals to Central America this week alone. The outcome may redefine presidential authority over immigration enforcement for generations.