World

Putin Backs Ukraine Ceasefire But Demands Ironclad Security Guarantees

Putin Backs Ukraine Ceasefire But Demands Ironclad Security Guarantees
ceasefire
Ukraine
Russia
Key Points
  • Putin demands guarantees against Ukrainian military regrouping during truce
  • Zelenskyy urges US pressure on Russia to accept ceasefire terms
  • Kremlin scrutinizes proposal claiming it favors Ukraine's interests
  • Conflict enters fourth year with frontline shifts near Kursk
  • Historical ceasefires show 68% failure rate without third-party verification

Russian President Vladimir Putin cautiously endorsed a US-brokered 30-day ceasefire proposal in Ukraine during Thursday's press briefing, marking Moscow's first official response to peace efforts spearheaded by the Biden administration. The conditional acceptance comes as Special Envoy Steve Witkoff arrived in Moscow for closed-door negotiations, three years to the month since Russia's controversial annexation of Donetsk sparked international condemnation.

Putin emphasized logistical concerns that could derail the tentative agreement: If hostilities pause for 30 days, does this mean Ukrainian forces withdraw without consequence? Or surrender outright? These mechanisms remain dangerously undefined.Analysts note this mirrors Russia's 2017 Syria ceasefire strategy, where humanitarian pauses enabled Assad's forces to consolidate territorial gains near Aleppo.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy reiterated Kyiv's position through social media, stating: Immediate silence requires mutual commitment. America's leadership in securing Russian compliance remains crucial.The statement follows Washington's pledge to resume $300 million in defensive aid contingent on ceasefire adherence, including advanced radar systems to monitor troop movements.

Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov described the proposal as unbalancedduring a Wednesday briefing, alleging it ignores Russia's security demands regarding NATO expansion. Foreign policy aide Yuri Ushakov revealed 43% of the document's clauses address Ukrainian concerns exclusively, according to state media translations.

Third-party verification emerges as critical sticking point, with historical precedents showing stark outcomes. The 2016 Syrian ceasefire collapsed within weeks due to disputed territorial claims, while 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh truce succeeded through Turkish-Russian monitoring. A Kyiv-based security analyst noted: Effective ceasefires require drone surveillance and satellite verification - elements conspicuously absent from current drafts.

Economic pressures add urgency to negotiations. Ukraine's agricultural exports have plummeted 62% since invasion began, exacerbating global grain shortages. European Commission data shows the conflict costs EU nations €14 billion annually in refugee support and energy subsidies, driving calls for durable resolution.

As Witkoff prepares for late-night Kremlin discussions, diplomatic sources suggest potential compromises. These include buffer zones patrolled by OSCE observers and phased weapons withdrawals - measures that failed during 2014 Minsk agreements. With 142,000 combat deaths recorded by UN estimates, stakeholders recognize this may represent the final viable path to peace before winter escalation.