The trial of Hadi Matar, accused of the brutal 2022 attack against author Salman Rushdie, reached a critical juncture Thursday as defense attorneys rested their case without calling witnesses. Matar confirmed he would not testify after prosecutors concluded their seven-day presentation, which included forensic evidence and Rushdie’s harrowing account of losing vision in one eye.
Chautauqua County Judge David Foley formally closed testimony after Matar’s refusal, setting the stage for Friday’s closing arguments. The 27-year-old New Jersey resident faces charges of attempted murder and assault for stabbing Rushdie during a literary event at the Chautauqua Institution. Rushdie, 77, suffered life-altering injuries during the attack that drew global condemnation.
“Free Palestine,”
Matar repeatedly declared to news cameras during courtroom transfers, though his legal team avoided commenting on whether these statements related to trial strategy. Observers noted his attentive demeanor throughout proceedings, frequently taking notes with his defense counsel.
Key developments include:
- Federal prosecutors preparing a parallel case accusing Matar of attempting to support Hezbollah
- Forensic analysts detailing the weapon’s origins and assault mechanics
- Rushdie’s testimony marking his first public remarks since the attack
The dual-track legal strategy highlights the case’s complexity, with state charges focusing on the physical attack and federal allegations addressing terrorism-related activities. Legal experts suggest this approach ensures accountability regardless of individual trial outcomes.
As jury deliberations approach, questions linger about Matar’s motivations and potential connections to extremist groups. The trial’s western New York venue – mere miles from the attack site – adds local significance to proceedings scrutinized worldwide.