World

Serbia Backlash Against Kushner’s NATO Bombing Site Development

Serbia Backlash Against Kushner’s NATO Bombing Site Development
protests
corruption
development
Key Points
  • Luxury complex at bombed military site sparks outrage
  • 99-year lease approved amid corruption allegations
  • Protests linked to broader anti-government movement
  • Development includes Trump hotel and bombing memorial
  • Vucic faces criticism over authoritarian policies

Belgrade’s streets filled with thousands of demonstrators this week opposing Jared Kushner’s controversial real estate project at the former Yugoslav Army headquarters. The site holds deep symbolic value as the location suffered extensive damage during NATO’s 78-day bombing campaign in 1999 that killed over 2,500 people. Critics argue constructing luxury apartments and a Trump-branded hotel here disrespects historical trauma while benefiting foreign investors.

Architectural preservationists revealed three critical flaws in the government’s approval process: heritage designation removal occurred without public consultation, environmental impact studies were fast-tracked, and safety regulations appeared relaxed for the $500 million project. These concerns gained urgency after November’s deadly train station collapse that killed 16, which independent engineers directly linked to rushed construction practices.

The protests reflect Serbia’s complex geopolitical positioning. While President Vucic courts EU membership, his administration maintains strong ties with Russia and China – a balancing act complicated by this U.S.-backed development. Analysts note a regional pattern: neighboring Croatia faced similar controversies when UAE investors redeveloped war-damaged Dubrovnik sites in 2019, prioritizing tourism over historical preservation.

Construction industry experts highlight three troubling trends: 63% of state-tendered projects bypass standard safety reviews, foreign developers secure 40% longer lease terms than domestic firms, and memorial spaces in commercial developments see 78% lower visitor engagement. These insights fuel accusations that the Kushner deal prioritizes profit over collective memory.

Opposition leaders warn the unrest could escalate following last month’s revelation that Kushner’s firm stands to gain $300 million in tax breaks. With daily protests now entering their 14th week, political analysts suggest Vucic’s 55% approval rating – down from 68% in January – signals growing public distrust in infrastructure decisions.