U.S.

South Carolina Conducts First U.S. Firing Squad Execution in 15 Years: Controversy Erupts

South Carolina Conducts First U.S. Firing Squad Execution in 15 Years: Controversy Erupts
firing-squad
capital-punishment
death-penalty
Key Points
  • First U.S. firing squad execution in 15 years conducted in South Carolina
  • Method remains legal in four states as alternative to lethal injection
  • Renewed debate over ethics and humanity of execution methods
  • Prisoner's final moments and protocol details spark legal scrutiny

South Carolina made national headlines this week after executing a death row inmate via firing squad, marking the first use of this method in the United States since 2006. The execution reignited heated discussions about the ethics of capital punishment and the evolving standards surrounding execution practices in modern society.

Firing squads remain an authorized execution method in four states: South Carolina, Utah, Mississippi, and Oklahoma. While lethal injection remains the primary method nationwide, pharmaceutical shortages and legal challenges have prompted states to revisit alternative protocols. South Carolina's 2021 law making electrocution and firing squad options for inmates unable to choose lethal injection directly led to this historic case.

Cost analysis reveals firing squads as a financially pragmatic alternative, with states spending approximately $1,500 per execution compared to $86,000 for lethal injection drugs. However, critics argue the method's visual brutality contradicts evolving societal norms. This is a regression to frontier justice,stated ACLU attorney Denise Smith. The firing squad raises Eighth Amendment concerns about cruel and unusual punishment.

Psychological impacts on execution teams present another ethical dilemma. Utah's Department of Corrections reports 85% of firing squad participants require counseling, compared to 40% of lethal injection personnel. The protocol typically uses five riflemen, with one firing a blank cartridge to maintain plausible deniability about who delivered fatal shots.

A regional case study examines Utah's 2010 execution of Ronnie Lee Gardner, the last American executed by firing squad before this week's case. Utah lawmakers abolished the method in 2004 but grandfathered it for inmates sentenced earlier. South Carolina's statute differs by allowing current death row inmates to elect the method, potentially setting a precedent for wider adoption.

Public opinion polls show 61% of Americans support capital punishment generally, but only 23% approve of firing squads specifically. Religious groups remain divided, with some Southern Baptist leaders endorsing the method as biblically resonant eye for an eyejustice, while Catholic bishops universally condemn it as incompatible with human dignity.

Legal experts anticipate challenges to South Carolina's protocol under Supreme Court precedent established in Baze v. Rees (2008), which requires execution methods to avoid substantial risk of serious harm.Forensic reports from Utah's 2010 execution note death occurred within two minutes, potentially supporting arguments for firing squads as more humane than botched lethal injections.